TIPS,TRICK,VIRAL,INFO
The i dot in Figure 8 is exactly above the stem. This is the sign of accuracy, perfection, excellent judgment, excellent memory, and strong faithfulness to details. This writer often has a matter-of-fact personality. He is not abandoned careful in dotting the i, but places it exactly where it belongs...
When the capital letter I-the ego-is written huge, this is the image the writer has of himself. Surely he is entirely egocentric, a megalomaniac.
A block letter shows culture, someone who reads. This is the capital I found in most books.
The unadorned I shows nothing extra and similarly indicates the person who sticks to the simplest essentials.
The large, ugly I in the manner of hooks is the sign of arrogance and greed. This writer is every out for himself, in accord to avoid responsibilities.
The I that looks similar to the number 1 shows a attachment to numbers. Often these people are found to excel in mathematics.
When the I dot is to the right, it is referred to as the declare placed i dot. This writer's thoughts run in tummy of his actions, and his writing shows speed. His urge is to finish his task without excruciating virtually exact details.
The pre-placed i dot, which is to the left, shows procrastination, caution, deficiency of self-confidence, repression. The left, represents the bearing in mind (the writer lives in the past), whereas the i dot to the right of the stem-the post-placed- i dot represents the future.
The exactly placed I dot above the stem is the sign of accuracy, perfection, excellent judgment, excellent memory, strong adherence to details. This writer often has a matter-of-fact personality. He is not forlorn careful in dotting the i, but places it exactly where it belongs. This shows concentration. Many panel of adjudicators and scientists dot their i's in this fashion.
The i dots which are exactly above the i stem are often found in the midst of people who are considered deeply moral people. They usually put up with strongly conservative points of view, in contrast to the writers of the post-placed i dots, who are more likely to be liberals. The post-placed writer lets himself go, whereas the exacting writer weighs all action.
The high-flying dot shows the person whose thoughts are tall in the sky. He is generally unrealistic, but if he attains his improbable goals, he does correspondingly in a huge way.
When an i dot is not essentially a dot, but a vertical line, it is a sign of criticism, of a person who has a mighty business with principles. Not lonely does the distress of the dot seem afterward a descending knife, but it can in addition to pass for an exclamation point, demonstrating emphasis.
An i dot formed of a circle reflects the eccentric-sometimes mildly so, sometimes not in view of that mildly. These people produce an effect mild neurotic tendencies and are frequently unable to point reality. They go after fads quite often and are of an artistic nature. The tardy performer Walt Disney wrote a similar i dot. It is interesting that his circled i dot looks certainly similar to Mickey Mouse's round ears.
The unquestionably buoyant 'i' dot indicates a dearth of willpower, possibly inborn illness or even illness, as if the person did not have the strength to dot the i properly. (A buoyant t bar obviously shows the thesame meaning.)
When we look an i dot associated to unusual letter (and for that matter, any letter that requires a dot or bar), it shows a clever fascination of thoughts-doing two things in one shot, in view of that to speak. These are the personalities of chess players, people who can solve abstract and intricate puzzles and make reasoned deductions.
When the i dot is an arc that opens at the left side, it is a sign of the neurotic, undependable personality. He shies away from the system. The arc, which is regarded as the eye, is looking toward the left indicating a deficiency of trust in somebody he has been practicing when in the recent past. (It is often the untrustworthy person who does not trust others)
When the i dot is in the form of an arc contact to the right, it is the sign of the observer. The arc itself looks next an eye staring at something.
When the dot is directly greater than the stem and heavy, it indicates fine memory, unassailable judgment, and the completion to attain detail work. You often locate this writer to be very materialistic and in a acknowledge of depression. (Heaviness in writing shows the physical, and the subconscious brings upon materialism.) in this area the depression, it seems to be a weight upon the writer's head, carrying an other load.
When the dots are more following dashes, they signify energy, worry, and irritability. If you go higher than these dots yourself, you can vis--vis character liveliness, irritability, and after that a determined degree of speed. later the i needs a dot and precision is in point of fact necessary, this writer flings his pen in such a tell as to create the dots into dashes. It shows he does not care, because there is something bothering him.
When the i dots look more similar to commas or arcs, they are signs of humor, wit, and gaiety. If you see next door to at them, they resemble laughing mouths.
An i without a dot may helpfully indicate eagerness (which would have to be checked similar to the on fire of the writing). Otherwise, the dotless i shows forgetfulness, carelessness, neglect. This is as well as genuine of the t bar without the bar.
A note very nearly genius: There is no hard-and-fast announce for recognizing genius through a person's handwriting. However, clear signs often do appear in the script of great-minded men: high upper-zone clarification (without loops), and/or extremely small, or even microscopic, center zones. (There is no particular guideline to the humiliate zones.)
Generally speaking, since the center zone is the social area, the larger it is, the less the powers of concentration. Thus, the great mind tends to acquit yourself in his handwriting a willingness to provide taking place the social world for more intense powers of concentration.
Since the average size of a zone is 3 millimeters, everything below this size we call small and the smaller in size it gets, the stronger the concentration, usually at the expense of sociability.
Other traits commonly found in the handwriting of the genius are tremendous eagerness and sloppiness, indicating that the person's thinking is fittingly far away ahead of his writing that he has no era for meticulous penmanship.
Although a genius may slope many of his t bars and i dots well to the right of the stem, he will place others subsequent to good precision, for, however tersely he may be thinking, much of his sham requires exactitude as competently as speed.
A form that frequently turns stirring in the writing of someone in imitation of a tall IQ is a g made in the have an effect on of a figure 8, showing keenness plus a distinct grace.
May we digress to the subject of legibility?
The fact of legibility in handwriting and its degree are not therefore easy to establish. We way in cumulative words at a time, some of us combined phrases. Consequently, one or even several illegible letters in a word will not prevent us from correctly guessing what the word is from the context. As experienced readers, we truly do not mind a not wholly legible hand. As graphologists, we must be less lenient.
To confirm the legibility of handwriting, we must try to log on it word by word. unaccompanied subsequently handwriting proves to be legible in a word-by-word study can it be pronounced legible.
To interpret a hand graphologically, on the basis of its legibility, we must ask ourselves why a person may pick to write, nevertheless at the thesame epoch write illegibly. Lip facilitate is the phrase that comes first to our mind. To let the gesture stand for the war is the intent of one who writes but does thus illegibly. Or he may believe to be himself therefore innovative that reading his missive is the recipient's duty; narcissism and arrogance, therefore, may next guide to illegible handwriting.
Or we may write the statement while we would select to keep its contents to ourselves. In this case, it may be affectation of mysteriousness, or neurotic anxiety, or psychotic suspiciousness, or perhaps even a persecution profound that blurs our hand. It was distrust that created cipher or code writing.
Paranoia or persecution mania, to be sure, does not make handwriting wholly illegible. upon the contrary, paranoiacs often write meticulously legibly, as even though grating their best not to anger any suspicion. But there simultaneously appear determined by yourself illegible characters or words;
they see considering corrections, but the upshot is always all but supreme illegibility. Paranoiacs seem to be feverishly bent upon improving themselves and apprehensive beyond what might be misinterpreted and criticized by others, but it probably is allocation of their mental disease not to succeed but rather to create things still worse.
A person taking into account an illegible or neglected hand cannot be called either sincere or co-operative. For if he has nothing to hide, or in reality wants to be understood by his neighbor, why should he write illegibly? We must undertake that he does not care whether or not we can right to use his letter. This is not the pretension of a considerate person. Indeed, inconsiderateness, carelessness, (in clothing, too), insincerity, and even bad manners may be observed in people afterward barely legible hands. categorically probably, they would next be unpunctual, disorderly, and indolent. There was a times gone well-educated people, and especially intellectuals, thought it beneath them to write a legible handwriting. Freud has, I think, interpreted the illegible hand of doctors, for instance, as portion of their professional arrogance and secretiveness; they attain not want the layman to comprehend their notes obviously reserved for other doctors or pharmacists. However, it is quite conceivable that some scientists or thinkers, certainly much cold from the world, forget that others may next wish to log on their writings: (Einstein obviously is not one of these; his handwriting is legible).
People when tiny training in penmanship realize not write illegibly or carelessly. Their writing may look rather helpless, untrained, but it is often remarkably legible.
A person's illegible signature does not take of any pleased interpretation. For how much trust can be placed in a document if the signature that is to prove the signer's aim to carry out his promises cannot be deciphered? In a sense, an illegible signature annuls the document it pretends to put in force. (Only an anonymous letter or a ransom note goes skillfully when an illegible signature.) A special kind of illegible signature, the paraph, is used by people who think they are above the necessity of identifying themselves by means of their signature. The best-known exploit is Napoleon and the man when Napoleonic aspirations. If a man thinks of himself as one whom everybody must know and blindly obey, why should he argument to write his signature legibly? Indeed, a paraph will suffice. If psychoanalysis of the handwriting sample reveals that here and there, one letter stands for different totally plainly, for example, an l for a b or an h for a k, we know from experience that the sample originated in the manner of a liar, a swindler, or a cheat.
("Adolf" in Adolf Hitler's signature)
Indistinct figures are made by careless people and people whose attitude in financial matters is not clear. But figures that can be misread, for example, a 5 for an 8, or a 1 for a 7, and in view of that on, are allied later than fraudulent intentions on the allowance of the writer.
Legibility, on the new hand, is characteristic of sincere individuals and of people who have a fine aptitude for purposeful work. Legible handwriting may also be allied similar to orators, teachers, and pedants; the style value will say us whether the hand is that of a good college or merely a pedant's.
There are some peculiarities not far off from the pace of writing, which we must know in order to charm exact conclusions. For instance, Saudek found that tall letters, such as f, are always more speedily written than minimum (small) letters, such as i; therefore, a small script is always more reluctantly formed than a sizable one. The rounded letters are produced "without pause," angular formations never without "stopping for a fraction of a second in the past the transition from one processing to the other." The angle writer, therefore, is always a hedger. The thesame holds authenticated of handwriting subsequent to many damage lines, or in the manner of many changes in
direction, particularly left-tending strokes (in a writing movement, which, as ours, is mainly right tending). "No one is proficient of making a dot later writing at a high rate of speed, but will then again build . . . a comma or accent." Similarly, a spontaneous writer will not area the dots exactly beyond the i's. upon the further hand, and no-one else spontaneity can fabricate a straight line, a slowly executed straight stock beast necessarily broken. Moreover, spontaneity will always incline its writing to the right; upright or left slanted writing is never formed spontaneously.
Examination for Lesson 5
1. What type of capital shows extreme egocentricity?
2. The 'unadorned' capital indicates what type of personality?
3. Which 'i' dot reflects procrastination?
4. Which type of 'i' dot discloses strong loyalty to details?
5. What does the 'i' dot joined to other letter reveal?
6. Which 'i' dot reveals humor, wit, and gaiety?
7. Intense powers of concentration are frequently found in the script of the genius.
Describe this unique type of writing and the zone.
8. Code writing was created because of trust-or the opposite?
9. following determined lonesome illegible words appear, which type of mania is suggested?
10. Sincerity and co-operating are more likely to be found in legible or illegible script?
A. Legible B. Illegible
11. Who are 'known' to write illegibly in view of that that the layman will not comprehend their notes?
12. An illegible signature annuls or confirms the document it pretends to put in force?
A. Annuls___ B. Confirms___
13. get spontaneous writers area the dots exactly greater than the 'i's or not?
Answers for Lesson 5
1. One that is enormous
2. The person who sticks to the simplest essentials.
3. The pre-placed i dot
4. The i dot that is exactly above the stem.
5. It shows a clever inclusion of thoughts-doing two things in one shot, as a result to speak. These are the personalities of chess players, people who can solve abstract and intricate puzzles and create logical deductions.
6. i dots that see more next commas or arcs. (They resemble smiling mouths).
7. unconditionally small, or even microscopic, middle zones. The center zone is the social area, the larger it is, the less the powers of concentration. hence the great mind tends to performance in his handwriting a willingness to allow happening the social world for more intense powers of concentration.
8. The opposite
9. Paranoia or persecution mania
10. Legible
11. Doctors
12. Annuls
13. They complete not area the dots exactly higher than the 'i'.
